Every deal runs on its own vocabulary. This glossary defines the terms behind RFPs, proposals, and modern sales workflows, in plain language, for the teams who live them.
A government tender is a tender issued by a public body, where the buying process is governed by procurement regulations rather than by commercial preference. Rules on advertising, evaluation, and award are set in law, and suppliers can challenge a decision that does not follow them.
Public bodies spend other people's money, so the process is built to be auditable rather than efficient. That produces a market with unusual properties for a supplier: opportunities are advertised openly, the evaluation criteria are published in advance, and the buyer cannot simply prefer the incumbent. It is one of the few places where a smaller supplier can beat a larger one on the strength of a document.
The trade is administrative weight. Certifications, financial evidence, policies, and past-performance records are checked before anyone reads your commercial argument, and a missing document can end the bid before evaluation begins. Suppliers who win public work repeatedly have made that paperwork a standing asset rather than a scramble.
Four things, mostly. Contracts above set thresholds must be advertised publicly, which is why the opportunities are findable. Selection and award criteria have to be published and then actually applied, so the scoring is more predictable than in private deals. Award decisions trigger a standstill period during which unsuccessful bidders can request a debrief or challenge. And social value, environmental, or local employment criteria increasingly carry real weight in the score rather than sitting as boilerplate.
Bidders are also assessed on suitability before capability. Turnover ratios, insurance levels, health and safety records, and comparable contract experience are checked through a standard questionnaire, and failing a mandatory threshold removes you regardless of how good the rest of the bid is.
A private buyer running an RFP can change the criteria, shortlist on instinct, extend a deadline for one bidder, or cancel and go direct. A public buyer usually cannot do any of those without exposing the award to challenge. That rigidity cuts both ways: the process is fairer, and it is also slower and less forgiving of a late or non-compliant submission.
The commercial content of the two is broadly the same, so the same material set answers both. What differs is the compliance envelope around it, which is why bidders treat public work as a tender discipline rather than as a sales motion with extra forms.
A health authority advertises a five-year contract for interpretation services. A mid-sized supplier passes the selection questionnaire on the strength of insurance, accreditations, and three comparable contracts. The award stage weights 50 percent quality, 30 percent price, and 20 percent social value. The supplier scores below a larger competitor on price but wins on social value by evidencing local recruitment and interpreter training commitments with actual numbers rather than intentions.
Public bidding rewards suppliers who can produce a complete, compliant, evidenced submission on a fixed date, repeatedly. The obstacle is rarely the argument. It is holding the certifications, policies, case evidence, and pricing logic in a form that can be assembled again next month for a different buyer. Cobl keeps that material with the deal and generates the submission set from it, so the compliance layer stops consuming the time that should go to the scored answers.
For a supplier building a public-sector practice, that is the difference between bidding four contracts a year and bidding twenty. The win rate matters less than the number of qualified bids you can actually produce.
Usually any supplier that meets the published selection criteria, including small businesses. Requirements typically cover financial standing, relevant insurance, health and safety, and comparable experience. Some contracts are reserved for specific supplier types, such as social enterprises, and the notice will say so.
A short pause between notifying the award decision and signing the contract, ten days in many regimes, during which unsuccessful bidders can request feedback or raise a challenge. It exists so that a flawed award can be corrected before the contract becomes binding.
Not usually. Selection questionnaires ask for comparable contracts, and comparable does not mean identical or public. Private contracts of similar scale and complexity generally qualify, though some buyers weight sector experience in the award criteria rather than the selection stage.
Cobl reads the RFP and generates the full response set: go/no-go, answers, technical proposal, pricing, and slides, built on your own rules.